datasets used | total |
---|---|
commercial use allowed | 37 |
restricted use | 62 |
unclear/undocumented | 9 |
Map updates
Priorities for map updates
As part of our data curation process we consider updates and improvements to all the maps. This is currently done in an irregular basis depending on time and resource availability.
We have set up some priorities for map development and updates, but we also consider issues raised by users. Please add your comments and suggestions using the dialogue boxes below each page, or go directly to our GitHub repository.
Checking dataset licenses
First we check the dataset licenses and aim to replace datasets that have any restrictions of use.
Improving quality
The second step is to review map quality as we aim to create higher quality maps with better overall evaluation:
Evaluation | total |
---|---|
Best | 14 |
Good enough | 5 |
Unsatisfactory | 18 |
Next steps
flowchart TB check1(["Check datasets used:\n license?"]):::checks check2(["Check:\n - spatial resolution\n- validation\n- concept match\n(uncertainty)"]):::checks step1(["Search\navailable/new\n datasets"]):::checks ready(["Hurray!"]):::done almostready([Best possible version\nflag any issues]):::done classDef checks fill:#d0e9fa,stroke:#000 classDef steps fill:#d0d93a,stroke:#000 classDef done fill:#c6fc9c,stroke:#000 check1 -->|n=37 allows\ncommercial use| check2 check1 -->|n=62 restricted use| step1 check1 -.->|n=7 unclear/undocumented| step1 check2 -->|n=14 golden standard| ready check2 -->|n=5 not perfect\nbut close enough| almostready check2 -->|n=18 unsatisfactory| step1
Summary of license and evaluation of EFG maps to identify priorities for map updates.